Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Ophthalmic Surgery
  •  Pediatric Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Cardiovascular Surgery
  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Gastroenterological Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2024;9(1):3707.Research Article | Open Access

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques

Oberhammer L*, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, Oswald D and Mitterberger MJ

Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Austria

*Correspondance to: Lukas Oberhammer 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3707

Abstract

Purpose: To compare oncological, peri-, and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted with those of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with low- or moderate-complexity renal tumors (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring) were randomized in a single-blind manner and operated on by the robotassisted (n=13) or laparoscopic (n=17) approach. The primary outcome was oncological safety, based on the Residual tumor (R) classification. Secondary outcome parameters were perioperative and postoperative results. The open-source R statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two surgical methods (p=0.58). Operating time (p=0.105), ischemia time (p=0.884), overall length of hospital stay (p=0.664), postoperative pain, and preoperative and in-hospital renal function scores were similar. Creatinine levels differed significantly six months postoperatively (robotic: 0.9 mg/dl vs. laparoscopic: 1.1 mg/ dl; p=0.014). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the laparoscopic group (400 ml vs. 168 ml; p=0.028), which was also reflected in postoperative hemoglobin levels (13.8 mg/dl vs. 12.5 mg/dl; p=0.012). Peri- or post-operative complications did not differ significantly (p=0.355). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly more frequent complications in patients with moderatecomplexity tumors treated by laparoscopic surgery (p=0.021). Conclusion: The oncological outcome in regard to the R status was similar in both groups. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative renal function, and complications all benefited from robotassisted surgery. Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03900364; 03/04/2019).

Keywords

Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Nephrometry score

Cite the article

Oberhammer L, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques. Clin Surg. 2024; 9: 3707.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

IL-36, 37 and 38 in Ulcerative Colitis
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Thirty Days of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Feasibility Study
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...