Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):2209.Research Article | Open Access

Validation and Proposal for Refining the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma

Sarang Hong, Ki Byung Song, Young-Joo Lee, Kwang-Min Park, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Sang Hyun Shin, Jaewoo Kwon, Chung Hyeun Ma, Seunghyun Hwang, Guisuk Park, Yejong Park, Seung Jae Lee and Song Cheol Kim

Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, South Korea

*Correspondance to: Ki Byung Song 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2209

Abstract

Background: Studies focusing on Duodenal Adenocarcinoma (DAC) are scarce and the clinicopathological features, patient characteristics, and survival factors of DAC are unknown. The 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for DAC incorporated the change focusing on positive Lymph Node (LN) numbers. We compared the classification systems in the 7th and 8th editions, and evaluated the clinicopathological features of and survival factors for DAC.Methods: One hundred thirty-five DAC patients undergoing operations at As an Medical Center from 2000 to 2016 were restaged according to the AJCC 8th edition.Results: One hundred and five patients underwent potentially curative resection and 30 underwent palliative surgery. In patients undergoing potentially curative resection, the median overall and disease-free survival were 89.5 and 52.1 months, respectively. The recurrence rate was 40.0%, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Although the new staging system for DAC could predict the prognosis satisfactorily, there is no other major improvement. A multivariate analysis revealed LN metastasis and T4 stage were the survival factors.Conclusion: The AJCC 8th edition staging system has the appropriate ability to predict prognosis in DAC patients. However, the survival was mainly related to the T4 stage and the presence of LN metastasis. The simpler staging system emphasizing on the T4 stage and LN metastasis is recommended.

Keywords

Duodenal adenocarcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; T4 stageDuodenal adenocarcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; T4 stage

Cite the article

Hong S, Song KB, Lee Y-J, Park K-M, Hwang DW, Lee JH, et al. Validation and Proposal for Refining the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 2209.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

RAF Kinase Inhibitory Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Profiles in Oral Cancers
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

A Four miRNAs Signature as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Survival Using Bioinformatics Analysis in Bladder Cancer
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Protein Identification and Haplotype Description of Homozygote Mutation Causing Congenital Plasminogen Deficiency
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...