Journal Basic Info
- Impact Factor: 1.995**
- H-Index: 8
- ISSN: 2474-1647
- DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
Major Scope
- Gynecological Surgery
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Plastic Surgery
- Bariatric Surgery
- Breast Surgery
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Transplant Surgery
Abstract
Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):2009.Case Report | Open Access
Small Vessels, Big Solutions; Use of Graft Conduit to Facilitate Transfemoral Impella CP Implantation
Monteagudo Vela M, Garcia Saez D, Zych B and Simon A
Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
*Correspondance to: Maria Monteagudo Vela
PDF Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2009
Abstract
Mechanical circulatory support appeared to provide us with time; time for recovery, for decision or for assessment. However they are known to be associated with different rates of mortality and morbidity. Impella device is a less invasive mechanical circulatory support but provides similar hemodynamic support compared with LVAD. Advantages include respiratory wean and early mobilization, lower anticoagulation requirements and less invasive surgical technique. Implanting options are limited and depend on the calibre of the vessel. A Transaxillary approach need a minimum diameter of 6mm. Remaining options includes transfemoral percutaneous insertion or a cut down femoral approach.
Keywords
Impella; Transfemoral approach; Cardiogenic shock
Cite the article
Monteagudo Vela M, Garcia Saez D, Zych B, Simon A. Small Vessels, Big Solutions; Use of Graft Conduit to Facilitate Transfemoral Impella CP Implantation. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 2009.