Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Ophthalmic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Bariatric Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):1977.Research Article | Open Access

Off-Pump vs On-Pump Complete Coronary Revascularization: Comparison of the Effects on the Renal Damage in Patients with Non- Dialysis Dependent Renal Dysfunction

Umit Arslan and Bilgehan Erkut

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Atatürk University, Turkey

*Correspondance to: Umit Arslan 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1977

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare off-pump technique with on-pump technique on renal function in patients with non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction who underwent CABG.Introduction: Preoperative non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction is a predictor of renal failure in patients undergoing CABG with CPB. Off-pump coronary revascularization has been shown to be less deleterious than on-pump bypass in patients.Methods: The 94 patients with renal dysfunction undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were retrospectively analyzed. No patient was receiving dialysis. Patients were randomly assigned to conventional revascularization with CPB and beating heart. Both groups were compared in terms of renal dysfunction parameters and dialysis requirement. The logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors associated with dialysis requirement.Discussion: Renal dysfunction requiring dialysis developed in 9 patients in the on-pump group. The measures analysis of variance was performed on the data that showed worsening of renal function in the on-pump group compared with the off-pump group. CPB is significant as independent predictor for the development of postoperative dialysis.Conclusion: These results suggest that off-pump coronary revascularization offers a superior renal protection and has a significantly lower risk for renal complications in patients with non-dialysisdependent renal dysfunction when compared with conventional coronary revascularization with CPB.

Keywords

On and off-pump coronary revascularization; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Renal insufficiency; Requiring dialysis; Surgical complications

Cite the article

Arslan U, Erkut B. Off-Pump vs On-Pump Complete Coronary Revascularization: Comparison of the Effects on the Renal Damage in Patients with Non- Dialysis Dependent Renal Dysfunction. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 1977.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Antimicrobial Peptides: A Potential Therapeutic Option for Surgical Site Infections
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

The Clinicopathologic Features and Management of Recurrent Thymoma
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Severe Delayed Postoperative Hyponatremia in a Case of TSH-secreting Pituitary Adenoma: A Case Report
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...