Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Urology
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Surgical Oncology
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Ophthalmic Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2017;2(1):1843.Research Article | Open Access

Side Docking vs. Central Docking in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy with daVinci Si: a Randomized Study

Giuseppe Quarto, Domenico Sorrentino, Raffaele Muscariello and Sisto Perdonà

Department of Urology, Istituto Tumori of Naples “G.Pascale”, Italy

*Correspondance to: Giuseppe Quarto 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1843

Abstract

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is performed routinely with central docking. This positioning can be associated with perineal nerve injury and compartment syndromes in rare cases. Moreover, the low lithotomy may not be feasible in patients with a history of bilateral hip arthroplasty which typically limits abduction position. In this study we investigate the feasibility and safety of side-docking techniques in robot-assisted urologic pelvic surgery.Method: 192 consecutive patients from March 2013 to September 2016 undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy participated in the study and randomized in two, groups: Group a (n 96) with side docking and Group B (n 96) central docking. Each patient was placed in the lithotomy- Trendelenburg position. The result was comparated in terms of docking time, operative time, and complication rate.Results: All the procedures were completed without the need for redocking. No significant collision between the robotic arms occurred. There was no Clavien-Dindo III-V complication in any case. Mean docking time was 5.7 min Group A and 6.2 min Group B Mean operative times was 123 minutes for group A and 125 for group B. All the procedures were completed without the need for redocking. No significant robot arm collision occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4 days (range 3-9 days). There was no Clavien-Dindo grade III-V complication in our series.Discussion and
Conclusion: Side docking for robotic radical prostatectomy is a viable alternative positioning technique for patients with hip abduction limitations to the standard low lithotomy positioning. Major alterations with the surgical technique are not required, and the perioperative outcomes are comparable to outcomes with the standard low lithotomy positioning.

Keywords

Cite the article

Quarto G, Sorrentino D, Muscariello R, Perdona S. Side Docking vs. Central Docking in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy with daVinci Si: a Randomized Study. Clin Surg. 2017; 2: 1843.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Automated Sagittal Craniosynostosis Classification from CT Images Using Transfer Learning
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Circulating Tumor Cells Predict Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Prognostic Relevance of TERT Promoter Mutations in Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Association with Human Papillomavirus
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...